|
The Sound Investor Series #12
Click
here for printer friendly version
(Click
here to refresh this site)
Analyzing Real Estate in Your Investment Portfolio
Ed Hynes, CFA
August 23, 2005
As prices continue to climb, there is no shortage of articles about
real estate these days. I do not know if prices will continue skyward,
but I do have some thoughts on how investors should look at real
estate within their portfolios.
First, it is important to differentiate between residential real
estate, i.e. your home, and any other real estate investments you
might have. Most of my thoughts in this article concern your investment
in your home.
To help establish a foundation for our discussion it is important
to understand the long-term investment returns of real estate. For
the past 50 years or so, real estate investment returns have been
higher than bonds and lower than stocks. If we accept the long-term
connection between risk and return, this means real estate is riskier
than bonds and safer than stocks.
Looking forward, if you think bonds will return about 5% a year
and stocks around 9%, the expected long-term return of real estate
is 7%. But assets go through cycles where the returns are higher
than normal for a while, and then lower. We have all seen this with
the stock market over the past ten years - some years had increases
of 20% or 30% while other years saw declines of the same magnitude.
Overall the market was up about an average of 10% a year.
The real estate market has similar cycles although usually less
volatile. It appears it is currently at a point where prices are
increasing faster than the long-term average and such periods are
almost always followed by those where they go up more slowly than
normal.
How does real estate fit into your investment and retirement planning?
First, make sure you include your house when making a list of all
your assets to understand your total wealth. It is easy to see why
your home should be included, since for most of us it is our largest
asset and will play a critical role in funding retirement. If your
home equity is $50,000 and other investments total $50,000, 50%
of your $100,000 net worth is in real estate.
If you also have a mortgage, your economic exposure is actually
higher. Assuming you have a $50,000 mortgage, you actually have
a total of $100,000 in real estate and $50,000 in stocks or bonds.
So 67% of your investments are in real estate ($100,000 out of $150,000).
At the next financial planning step, when you make investment decisions
for your liquid or non-real estate assets, I recommend leaving your
home and mortgage out of the analysis. When we bought our homes
none of us planned for them to be a certain percentage of our net
worth, it just happened. We needed a roof over our head, and eventually
over a larger number of heads, so we bought what we could afford.
The question of what percentage of net worth should be in home
equity doesn't really make sense. I recently saw an article in a
major business weekly suggesting that for investors without mortgages
an ideal asset allocation strategy is 60% stocks, 10% bonds and
30% home equity. This strikes me as ridiculous! We buy houses for
shelter and life-style; and if it comes out to 25% or 70% of our
net worth, that's what it is, it is almost impossible to target.
By advocating a home equity target, there is the implication that
investors should increase their home real estate asset allocation
if their other assets increase in value. In fact, investors should
try and lower housing costs. For every dollar spent on an additional
room or taxes on a nicer house, you have one less dollar to invest
for retirement. Remember, a dollar invested today, and earning just
5% over inflation, will be worth a real $2.65 in 20 years. Just
having a bigger house or a nicer neighborhood is not necessarily
a good investment; you have to take other factors into account such
as maintenance and taxes.
In summary, investors should certainly include the value of their
homes and mortgages when looking at net worth and economic exposure
to various markets, but when deciding how much of their liquid assets
should be in stocks and bonds, leave your home out of the calculations.
Ed Hynes, CFA, is President of Farm Creek based
in Rowayton, CT. (203) 838-1025. This series of articles is available
at farmcreeksecurities.com. Before putting money in any investment,
you should carefully consider your investment objectives; and the
risks, charges and expenses of any investment. Past performance
is not an indication of future performance and there are risks to
investing including the loss of principal. Please contact Farm Creek
for a prospectus on any of the funds mentioned.
© Copyright 2005
| Back to the top
| Back to the previous page
|
This site uses frames to navigate. If you do not
see the navigation menu on the left part of your screen, please
click here to refresh this site.
© 2004 Farm Creek. All rights reserved.
Unauthorized access is prohibited.
|